Articles 6 deals with ‘international cooperation for mitigation action’. Article 6.8 has evolved to emphasize land sector actions -- from community to multi-country levels. The 6.8 non-market mechanism is superior for actions in the land sector due to its focus on joint-mitigation adaptation (JMA); the full contribution to the host country’s nationally-determined contribution (NDC); and its grounding in the rights-based language of the Paris Agreement Preamble.

The Article 6.8 implementation tools from COP26 in Glasgow in 2021 were launched at COP28 in Dubai in 2023. A web-based platform will help countries keep track of NDC progress and should enable countries, subnational governments and other approved entities to post project ideas. Beyond the web-based platform are a variety of matching mechanisms for developing and scaling gender-just and rights-based approaches.

The vision that has guided negotiators and contributors to the development of the non-market approach integrates people, nature, and climate. Article 6.8 is the bright spot for international cooperation going into COP28, because it is ready to implement.

While Article 6.2 and 6.4 are meant to create carbon offsets and credits focused solely on mitigation, from the beginning Article 6.8 has been understood as the setting where joint mitigation-adaptation (JMA) approaches can be developed, especially for the integral and sustainable management of forests.

Joint mitigation-adaptation approaches should be both people-centered and focused on improving ecosystem integrity. Both are necessary components of resilience in the face of climate change.

Read about Ecological Integrity

A number of CLARA members are working on alignment between goals of the UNFCCC and the Convention on Biological Diversity, and specifically, the pursuit of synergies between climate mitigation and biodiversity conservation.

Achieving the goals and targets of the CBD and UNFCCC will not be possible unless carbondense and species-rich ecosystems are protected and restored. The principle of ecosystem integrity must now be fully implemented in the monitoring frameworks and accounting rules of both Conventions.

Fortunately, the UN System of Enviromental-Economic Accounting (UN-SEEA) shows a way to implement these ecosystem-based approaches. Approved by the United Nations in 2021, this approach helps to make clear that high-integrity ecosystems provide more stable carbon sinks (for mitigation), better conservation outcomes, and lowered risk of the loss of ecosystem services (improved resilience and adaptation responses).

Read about Ecological Integrity

Article 6.8 provides better mitigation outcomes because there are no mitigation transfers, and no use of offset mechanisms to ‘excuse’ continued fossil fuel use elsewhere. Under the Article 6.4 mechanism, only 2% of all issued emissions reductions credits (A6.4ERs) are subject to mandatory cancellation to contribute to overall mitigation in global emissions, and a levy of only 5% of the issued credits are transferred to the Adaptation Fund.  This means that more than 90% of the proposed mitigation benefit is available for trading and offsetting purposes!

Contrast this with Article 6.8, where 100% of the mitigation effort is recorded on the NDC of the host country. Article 6.8 ensures an Overall Mitigation in Global Emissions (OMGE) – one of the key principles in which Article 6 is grounded.

Well managed Protected Areas, Indigenous territories including Indigenous Protected Areas that support traditional management, and landscape-level restoration are the best examples of conservation. These approaches deliver on mitigation, adaptation, biodiversity protection, ecosystem integrity and resilience. Article 6.8 provides the opportunity to deliver these robust climate and biodiversity outcomes and increase their prominence in the new round of NDCs.

CLARA has detailed the kinds of additional resources that can be mobilized from levies and taxes that seek to reduce fossil fuel use and dampen speculation in financial markets. This would deliver a ‘double win’ for land-based action.

CLARA also points to the variety of innovative finance approaches that could be supported through the Article 6.8 non-market mechanism. The web-based platform should enable direct access for local communities and Indigenous Peoples through the funding mechanisms they have developed.

Examples of innovative finance that advance 6.8’s focus on ecosystem integrity and community-led solutions: the Pawanka Fund, CLARIFI, the ForestPeoplesClimate platform, the Amazon Fund, and The Tenure Facility. At COP27, groups united by the Shandia Vision presented examples of successful direct funding mechanisms; the future workshops on Article 6.8 should build on this example. And to support direct access for community groups and national (and regional) indigenous federations, the web-based platform should provide clear simplified guidance and templates for adding proposals.

The Glasgow Leaders’ Declaration from COP26 is significant for the protection, conservation, and restoration of forests. The pledge included a target figure for dedicated finance: USD 12 billion, along with a commitment of USD 7.2 billion from philanthropic and other private sources.

Signers of the Glasgow pledge affirmed their commitment to “sustainable land use, and to the conservation, protection, sustainable management and restoration of forests, and other terrestrial ecosystems.” They noted the importance of “support for smallholders, Indigenous Peoples, and local communities, who depend on forests for their livelihoods and have a key role in their stewardship.” The language in the pledge is consistent with the goals of the Article 6.8 non-market mechanism!

The Glasgow Declaration was made outside the framework of UNFCCC negotiations; but Article 6.8 provides an opportunity now to fulfill those pledges in line with the requirements of the Paris Agreement.